Breaking News
BREAKING: Right-to-Carry Supreme Court Arguments Bode Well For 2A
Today, we have some excellent news straight from the nation’s highest court!
Following Wednesday morning’s oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the Second Amendment Foundation predicts a victory for the right-to-carry a firearm in public for personal protection.
“Based on questions from the Supreme Court Justices,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “I’m confident we’re going to win either on a 5-4 or 6-3 vote.”
He said suggestions from New York Solicitor General Barbara D. Underwood and Deputy Solicitor General Brian H. Fletcher with the U.S. Justice Department—both defending New York’s restrictive “may issue” carry law—that the case be remanded back to the lower courts smacks of an attempted stall.
“I think at that point the anti-gun rights justices as well as the attorneys for New York recognized they are not going to win,” Gottlieb observed, “and they were trying to forestall an unfavorable ruling. During the oral arguments several justices affirmed that the right to keep and bear arms does not stop at the front door.”
“This important Supreme Court case,” he added, “was only made possible by SAF’s 2010 Supreme Court victory in McDonald v. City of Chicago, which incorporated the Second Amendment to the states via the 14th Amendment.”
Presenting the oral argument for the plaintiffs, attorney Paul Clement told the court that the constitution protects carrying concealed firearms outside the home. He also said there should be no requirement for a citizen to prove a special need in order to exercise a constitutionally protected fundamental right. Questions and comments by several justices pointed out that many lower courts were not adhering to the Heller and McDonald decisions by the high court and not applying the proper heightened scrutiny levels that the Second Amendment deserves.
SAF filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the NYSR&PA case, which was joined by several other gun rights organizations.
“After listening to the oral arguments,” Gottlieb said, “I’m convinced the ruling will impact the other seven states that do not recognize Second Amendment rights with their discretionary ‘may issue’ carry laws. I also think the court’s ruling should impact dozens of other cases SAF has filed that are currently in the lower federal courts.
“An affirmative ruling, which we expect sometime in June 2022,” Gottlieb noted, “will only reinforce our mission to win back firearms freedom, one lawsuit at a time.”
-
Action Alerts3 weeks agoNFA Unconstitutional: Jensen v. ATF Ends 91-Year Gun Tax
-
Action Alerts2 months agoPam Bondi Gun Registry: 2A Blocks Reese v. ATF Overreach
-
Action Alerts1 month agoGovernment Shutdown Firearm Imports: 2025 Crisis
-
Gun Rights1 month agoDon Lemon Gun Hypocrisy: Arm Against Feds Now?
-
2A's Lighter Side2 months agoAmazon Bond Poster Edits: Backlash & Franchise Fears
-
Gun Rights1 month agoNew 2025 Gun-Law Roundup: NY, FL, DE, CA + SCOTUS Hemani
-
Gun Rights4 weeks ago2A Rights 2025: Elections Reshape Gun Laws in America
-
Laws & Rights2 weeks agoEpstein Files Second Amendment: 2025 Release Insights

