Breaking News
Naked: Kirk Slaying Exposes Left’s Lust for Violence
Yeah, that’s all of our faces right now.
Put that thing away, MSNBC. Nobody wants to see that.
Yesterday, conservative activist Charlie Kirk was murdered while speaking at a college event in Utah. Moments after the shot rang out—before it was certain whether Kirk might survive, before the shooter was caught, let alone before any details were released—the “liberal” side of the Internet exploded in an absolute orgy of naked, ghoulish joy nasty enough to turn Ron Jeremy’s stomach.
Yes, naked. Time was, the idiom we used to describe people who had revealed their true intentions was, “unmasked.” That metaphor isn’t adequate anymore, for several reasons, each more disgusting than the last. We’ve already noted the fact that, as always, the Lefties like AOC didn’t even wait for the blood to dry before they began blaming the Second Amendment. But we expected that; that’s been their modus operandi for decades.
But the Kirk assassination has teased the anti-gun Left into revealing much more than their faces. They welcomed it as a chance to drop trou and run around the Internet waving their hate-boners at everyone unfortunate enough to look.
For example, we had Matthew Dodd wondering aloud on MSNBC whether one of Kirk’s supporters had shot him “firing a gun off in celebration.” Does Dodd actually believe that conservatives randomly shoot our concealed-carry firearms willy-nilly when we’re happy, or did he think his comment would make his viewers chuckle? (That’s an inclusive “or,” by the way. Because the answer is “both.”)
Dodd wasn’t done, though. He then moved on to the next Leftist talking point about the assassination: That Kirk had brought it on himself with his “awful words.”
“You can’t stop with these awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and then not expect awful actions to take place,” sneered Dodd. And he wasn’t alone in whipping that one out. The New York Times’ obituary of Kirk also blames him for “provoking” violence.
The nastiest nudes, of course, were posted by the people with the most access to power. J.B. Pritzker, the current governor of Illinois, blamed Trump’s “rhetoric,” saying, “We saw the shootings, the killings in Minnesota. We’ve seen other political violence occur in other states, and I would just say it’s got to stop. And I think there are people who are fomenting it in this country. I think the president’s rhetoric often foments it. We’ve seen the January 6th rioters, who clearly, have tripped a new era of political violence.”
He’s not alone. Former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki twerked for the camera with a similar sentiment.
This isn’t commentary. It’s pornography. I say this not just because it’s disgusting; I say this because what we’re seeing is the release of pent-up pressure, rooted deep in the hindbrain, a primal need—not to reproduce, but to “be a winner.” To be the person who was on the “right side of history.”
It’s also, like pornography, rooted entirely in unachievable fantasy. It’s a fantasy in which the Leftist has been correct all along about everything, nothing has been his fault or the fault of his fellow travelers, and in which the bad people who opposed the Leftist get what’s coming to them. In this one-handed dream state, the Leftist can stroke himself publicly about his moral superiority even as he delights in the death of someone who didn’t agree with him.
In short, although we’re used to seeing Leftists not even waiting for the victim’s blood to dry before they start dancing in it, we aren’t used to them dancing naked. We aren’t used to them actually airing the cheers and celebration like a flasher’s junk flopping in the breeze.
What’s the most nauseating, of course, is that all of this bloodlust is directed at one of the kindest, most genteel conservatives in the space. Kirk was a man who believed in changing minds and hearts with honest, open conversations. He never shouted down his interlocutors; he listened to them and responded with respect. He spoke to them like human beings, even if they refused to act like they were.
The best way to honor Kirk’s memory would be to emulate him; to wade into the fray with a smile and a quip. To look people who disagree with us in the eyes and persuade them with facts and reason—and agree to disagree, if that fails. But as for me, as for right now, I can’t do that until the anti-gun Left does something very important:
Put some pants on, MSNBC, and try crossing your legs if you just can’t hide “it” any longer. If you can’t have a little decency, at least try for modesty.
Other Articles You May Be Interested In:
Charlie Kirk Assassinated: Details, Reactions & Manhunt (Photo Released)
Charlie Kirk Assassination: Silencing a Conservative Voice
Castle Defense With Mossberg 940 Pro Tactical SPX: Full Review
-
Action Alerts1 month agoPam Bondi Gun Registry: 2A Blocks Reese v. ATF Overreach
-
Action Alerts1 week agoNFA Unconstitutional: Jensen v. ATF Ends 91-Year Gun Tax
-
Action Alerts3 weeks agoGovernment Shutdown Firearm Imports: 2025 Crisis
-
2A Living2 months agoYouTube’s Demonetization of Gun Videos: 2A Rights Defense
-
Gun Rights4 weeks agoDon Lemon Gun Hypocrisy: Arm Against Feds Now?
-
2A's Lighter Side1 month agoAmazon Bond Poster Edits: Backlash & Franchise Fears
-
Gun Rights3 weeks agoNew 2025 Gun-Law Roundup: NY, FL, DE, CA + SCOTUS Hemani
-
Gun Rights2 weeks ago2A Rights 2025: Elections Reshape Gun Laws in America
James Gregg
October 7, 2025 at 2:45 pm
Except that Kirk’s murderer wasn’t Left Wing or even a Democrat. He was apolitical. Which means he was not interested in either party. He had turned leftist and had different views on LGBTQ according to his mother. But his mother’s political view points were far right wing which means anything to her left would still entail most of the right wing and centrist positions. Be most likely is a Nihilist. Nihilists don’t support either party but want society to crumble. The Dallas ICE shooter is also most likely a Nihilist as he too hated both political parties and politicians.
John H
September 12, 2025 at 5:59 pm
This article just proves that the violence is not limited to one side or the other. In Minnesota it was an uber right maga and in this case it appears to be a kid gone off the uber left rails. This nonsense has to stop, the middle has to come back into control or the system will fail.
BeoBear
September 12, 2025 at 6:55 pm
Which Minnesota shooting are you referring to because I can’t find one with an “Uber right maga” shooter? If you’re referring to the Annunciation Church shooting the shooter was most certainly far left as they identified as transgender and had AR magazines with sayings like “Kill Trump”. That one was very far left. If we’re going to play that game we can list all the “right vs left” mass shooters or attempted shooters but I just added them up and it was a landslide for the left.
Nothing gets better if people try to dodge responsibility by claiming it’s not their fault. These acts of violence are OVERWHELMING perpetrated by people who identify with the far left. They leave plenty of evidence so everyone knows. It is most certainly the responsibility of the left.
Jon B
September 12, 2025 at 9:08 pm
Vance Boelter, 57, has been indicted on six federal charges in connection with the stalking and murders of Minnesota House of Representatives Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark Hortman, the stalking and shooting of Minnesota State Senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette Hoffman, and the attempted shooting of their daughter Hope Hoffman, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph H. Thompson.
According to court documents, after extensive research and planning, Boelter embarked on a murderous rampage targeting Minnesota’s elected officials and their families. On June 14, 2025, the defendant disguised himself as a member of law enforcement and traveled to the homes of Democratic elected officials with the intent to intimidate and murder.
Adrien
September 15, 2025 at 12:48 pm
January 6th was thousands of right. That covers it all
Pop LeCorque
September 12, 2025 at 10:33 am
When they can’t silence freedom by shouting it down they resort to violence while at the same time patriots fight to support 1A rights for EVERYONE!
randy bauer
September 12, 2025 at 10:02 am
It is a sad day when so-called pacifists actually cheer for the death of another human, no matter that they want us all to be unarmed sissies. I’ve watched all this go down since I could read, and I, for one, will not go down easily into the morass of Liberalism. It’s simply a bad idea that has historically never worked and never will. Perhaps we could find some place that actually wants these folks and send them there, like the moon or England.
Randy
September 11, 2025 at 5:51 pm
Only one way to deal with this. A MAJOR Civil War Now!!! Only a thousand times worse.
GomeznSA
September 11, 2025 at 8:55 pm
Randy I hope and pray that it never comes to that but at the rate the blood dancers are pushing it just might. I would prefer a somewhat civil national divorce so the blue states can get their ‘utopia’ and leave us deplorables alone. I know, that is wishful thinking on my part but without hope I believe the Republic truly is lost.