BREAKING: Right-to-Carry Supreme Court Arguments Bode Well For 2A
Today, we have some excellent news straight from the nation’s highest court!
Following Wednesday morning’s oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the Second Amendment Foundation predicts a victory for the right-to-carry a firearm in public for personal protection.
“Based on questions from the Supreme Court Justices,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “I’m confident we’re going to win either on a 5-4 or 6-3 vote.”
He said suggestions from New York Solicitor General Barbara D. Underwood and Deputy Solicitor General Brian H. Fletcher with the U.S. Justice Department—both defending New York’s restrictive “may issue” carry law—that the case be remanded back to the lower courts smacks of an attempted stall.
“I think at that point the anti-gun rights justices as well as the attorneys for New York recognized they are not going to win,” Gottlieb observed, “and they were trying to forestall an unfavorable ruling. During the oral arguments several justices affirmed that the right to keep and bear arms does not stop at the front door.”
“This important Supreme Court case,” he added, “was only made possible by SAF’s 2010 Supreme Court victory in McDonald v. City of Chicago, which incorporated the Second Amendment to the states via the 14th Amendment.”
Presenting the oral argument for the plaintiffs, attorney Paul Clement told the court that the constitution protects carrying concealed firearms outside the home. He also said there should be no requirement for a citizen to prove a special need in order to exercise a constitutionally protected fundamental right. Questions and comments by several justices pointed out that many lower courts were not adhering to the Heller and McDonald decisions by the high court and not applying the proper heightened scrutiny levels that the Second Amendment deserves.
SAF filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the NYSR&PA case, which was joined by several other gun rights organizations.
“After listening to the oral arguments,” Gottlieb said, “I’m convinced the ruling will impact the other seven states that do not recognize Second Amendment rights with their discretionary ‘may issue’ carry laws. I also think the court’s ruling should impact dozens of other cases SAF has filed that are currently in the lower federal courts.
“An affirmative ruling, which we expect sometime in June 2022,” Gottlieb noted, “will only reinforce our mission to win back firearms freedom, one lawsuit at a time.”
Breaking News2 months ago
Texas Church Shooting Survivors Win Lawsuit Against Biden’s DOJ
Guns Save Lives2 months ago
Colorblind: Why African-Americans Keep Confusing Anti-Gunners
Smells Like Infringement1 month ago
Gun-Grabbers Never Learn! Case Study: Michigan
Smells Like Infringement3 weeks ago
Anti-Gun Playbook, Part II: Persecuting Pro-Gun People
2A's Lighter Side2 weeks ago
Anti-Gunners Blinded By SCIENCE
Breaking News3 days ago
Mask Off! Sen. Fetterman & His Lickspittle Journos Want to Repeal the 2A
2A's Lighter Side1 week ago
Gun Grabbers Demand Law Students’ Souls (Guess Why the Joke’s on Them)
Breaking News1 month ago
Extra! Extra! Extraordinary EDC $5K Guns & Gear Giveaway for May!