Connect with us

2A's Lighter Side

Boo-Hooicane Warning! Pro-Gun Cali Court Ruling Makes Landfall on Left Coast

Published

on

The “storm surge” picture was NSFW.

Beware the coming storm, borne on the jetstream from the Left Coast, flooding California with salty tears and plenty of hot air!

The Second Amendment Foundation has just reported a big win for gun rights in California (of all places). The long and short of it is that California has (up until now) denied gun rights to people who’ve been convicted of nonviolent felonies, even if those felonies were overturned or vacated later. Even, in fact, if everything happened in another state and that state fully restored their rights. As of yesterday, California isn’t going to be able to do that anymore. And soon, there will be a Category V Boo-Hooicane making its way East.

Why am I so certain that the mainstream media is about to flood the country with tears and whip it with 100-mph hot air? Because denying gun rights is really the only “law enforcement” the state does at all these days. Revolving-door incarceration policies and a contemptuous attitude towards law enforcement have done the damage you’d expect, and the state’s crime rates are soaring. The Left is bound and determined to find a way to blame all of the above on anyone or anything but their own ideologically driven and utterly failed policies … and yesterday’s 2A win is as good a candidate as any. Here are all the pertinent details, courtesy of SAF!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A federal judge in California has granted summary judgment to three individuals in a lawsuit challenging that state’s Penal Code which permanently denies Second Amendment rights to people who have had felony convictions vacated, set aside or dismissed, and their rights to possess firearms fully restored. The case is known as Linton v. Bonta.

U.S. District Judge James Donato in the Northern District of California wrote, “After multiple hearings and several rounds of briefing, and in light of the guidance provided by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen…the Court concludes that California has violated the Second Amendment rights of the individual plaintiffs. Consequently, summary judgment is granted in favor of (Chad) Linton, (Paul McKinley) Stewart, and (Kendall) Jones on their as applied Second Amendment claim.”

The case was originally filed in December 2018. They are represented by attorney George Lee of Seiler Epstein, LLP in San Francisco. The challenge was originally brought by SAF, the Calguns Foundation, Madison Society Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition and Firearms Policy Foundation and the three individuals. In his opinion, Judge Donato dismissed all the institutional plaintiffs. SAF continues to support the case.

According to SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut, “The three individual plaintiffs were all convicted of non-violent felonies in other states decades ago. None of the convictions involved a weapon, drugs, or violence, in the ordinary meaning of the word. Each of the plaintiffs had their conviction vacated, set aside, or dismissed, and their right to possess firearms restored by the jurisdiction in which they were convicted. Linton legally acquired firearms in California on prior occasions, and Jones was a career law enforcement officer in California with special training and certification as a firearms instructor. Even so, California acted to permanently deny them of the right to possess or own firearms, solely on the basis of their original convictions.”

“This is a huge victory,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “It could amount to a first major step to create an avenue for other people with similar circumstances to return to lives of full citizenship. We’re delighted with Judge Donato’s ruling. This is just one more example of our mission to win firearms freedom, one lawsuit at a time.”

Newsletter Sign Up

Trending

Copyright © 2021 Brand Avalanche Media, LLC. Freedom's Lodge is a wholly owned subsidiary of Brand Avalanche Media, LLC. This copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.